World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Please fill this short user satisfaction survey


Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: ClinicalTrials.gov
Last refreshed on: 13 May 2024
Main ID:  NCT04682639
Date of registration: 19/12/2020
Prospective Registration: No
Primary sponsor: Pfizer
Public title: A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Etrasimod in Adult Participants With Eosinophilic Esophagitis VOYAGE
Scientific title: A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Etrasimod in Adult Subjects With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Date of first enrolment: December 15, 2020
Target sample size: 108
Recruitment status: Completed
URL:  https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04682639
Study type:  Interventional
Study design:  Allocation: Randomized. Intervention model: Sequential Assignment. Primary purpose: Treatment. Masking: Double (Participant, Investigator).  
Phase:  Phase 2
Countries of recruitment
Australia Belgium Canada Germany Netherlands Spain Switzerland United States
Contacts
Name:     Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation:  Pfizer
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- Have an eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) diagnosis prior to screening and histologically
active disease with an esophageal peak eosinophil count (PEC) of = 15 eosinophils per
high powered field (eos/hpf)

- Have dysphagia, defined as solid food going down slowly or getting stuck in the throat
with an average frequency of = 2 episodes per week over 2 weeks during the Screening
period

Inclusion Criteria for the Extension Treatment Period

- Completion of the Week 24 study visit [including esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)]

- Compliance with study procedures during the Double-Blind Treatment Period as assessed
by the Investigator

- No notable safety concerns during the Double-Blind Treatment Period, as determined by
the Investigator

- Willing to comply with all study visits and procedures for the Extension Treatment
Period

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of any of the non-EoE conditions or procedures that may interfere with the
evaluation of or affect the histologic (eg eosinophilic gastritis), endoscopic (eg,
high-grade esophageal stenosis), or symptom endpoints (eg, esophageal resection) of
the study

- Undergone dilation of an esophageal stricture within 12 weeks prior to Screening EGD

- Use of corticosteroids for the treatment of EoE within 8 weeks prior to Screening EGD

- Discontinue, initiate, or change dosing (dosage/frequency) of the following therapies
for EoE within 8 weeks prior to Screening EGD. Participants on any of the following
therapy need to stay on a stable regimen during study participation:

1. Elemental diet

2. EoE food trigger elimination diet

3. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy

- Used any immunotherapy/desensitization including oral immunotherapy (OIT) or
sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) within 12 months prior to the Screening EGD. Note:
Stable (ie, = 6 months prior to the Screening EGD) subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT)
is permitted. Participants on SCIT need to stay on a stable treatment during study
participation

- Used any protocol-specified immunomodulatory therapies within the protocol-specified
timeframe prior to Baseline (eg, dupilumab, benralizumab, omalizumab, or infliximab
within 12 weeks; a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator at any time)

- Use of any investigational agent or device within 12 weeks prior to Baseline

- Females who are pregnant



Age minimum: 18 Years
Age maximum: 65 Years
Gender: All
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Intervention(s)
Drug: Placebo
Drug: Etrasimod
Primary Outcome(s)
Percent Change From Baseline in Esophageal Peak Eosinophil Count (PEC) at Week 16 [Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16]
Secondary Outcome(s)
Absolute Change From Baseline in Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) Score at Week 16 [Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16]
Percentage Of Participants With Esophageal Peak Eosinophil Count (PEC) Less Than (<) 15 Eosinophils/High Power Field (Eos/Hpf) at Week 16 [Time Frame: Week 16]
Absolute Change From Baseline in Esophageal Peak Eosinophil Count (PEC) at Week 16 [Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16]
Percentage of Participants With Esophageal Peak Eosinophil Count (PEC) Less Than or Equal to (<=) 6 Eosinophils/High Power Field (Eos/Hpf) at Week 16 [Time Frame: Week 16]
Secondary ID(s)
C5041009
APD334-206
2020-003226-23
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Please refer to primary and secondary sponsors
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Arena is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer
Ethics review
Results
Results available: Yes
Date Posted: 26/10/2023
Date Completed:
URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT04682639
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history Please fill this short user satisfaction survey