World Health Organization site
Skip Navigation Links

Please fill this short user satisfaction survey


Main
Note: This record shows only 22 elements of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. To view changes that have been made to the source record, or for additional information about this trial, click on the URL below to go to the source record in the primary register.
Register: ClinicalTrials.gov
Last refreshed on: 19 October 2017
Main ID:  NCT01514240
Date of registration: 10/01/2012
Prospective Registration: Yes
Primary sponsor: AstraZeneca
Public title: Phase III Study of D9421-C 9 mg in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease in Japan
Scientific title: A Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomised, Parallel-group, Phase III Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of D9421-C 9 mg Versus Mesalazine 3 g in Patients With Active Crohn's Disease (CD) in Japan
Date of first enrolment: February 2012
Target sample size: 123
Recruitment status: Completed
URL:  https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01514240
Study type:  Interventional
Study design:   
Phase:  Phase 3
Countries of recruitment
Japan
Contacts
Name:     Toshifumi Hibi, Professor, Chairman
Address: 
Telephone:
Email:
Affiliation:  Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine
Key inclusion & exclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

- 15 years of age or older

- Main active disease of the ileal, ileocecal region, and/or ascending colon - - If
treated with partial nutrition treatment (=1200 kcal/day) or if treated with
azathioprine (=2.0 mg/kg/day) or 6-mercaptopurine (=1.2 mg/kg/day), prior to
randomisation until the study completion or discontinuation

- Ability to read, write and to fill a diary card and HRQL questionnaire Having mild to
moderate active Crohn's disease, defined as CDAI score of 180-400 at baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patient with CD lesion or status which may affect the evaluation of the efficacy (e.g.
lesion only in the upper G-I, active anorectal lesion, abscess formation, stenosis,
fistulae, ostomy, short bowel or other uncontrolled concomitant disease)

- Patient who need any concomitant treatment for CD that may affect the assessment for
efficacy of the study drug

- Patient who need any medication which is prohibited due to suspected influence to
metabolism of the study drug

- Patient who is judged to be inadequate to participate in this study from the safety
point of view Patient with well-founded doubt about protocol violation



Age minimum: 15 Years
Age maximum: 130 Years
Gender: All
Health Condition(s) or Problem(s) studied
Crohn's Disease
Intervention(s)
Drug: D9421-C capsule 3 mg
Drug: Mesalazine tablets
Primary Outcome(s)
Remission After 8-week of Treatment [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Secondary Outcome(s)
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 10 - Social Function [Time Frame: 10 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 2 - Social Function [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 8 - Systemic Symptom [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Change in Observed CDAI Scores From Baseline to Weeks 2 [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 8 - Emotional Function [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Change in Observed CDAI Scores From Baseline to Weeks 4 [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Clinical Improvement Rates (Decrease in CDAI Score From Baseline of at Least 70 Points) at Weeks 2 [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Cumulative Remission Rate at Week 2 [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 2 - Emotional Function [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 4 - Bowel Function [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 4 - Social Function [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Change in Total IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 4 [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 10 - Systemic Symptom [Time Frame: 10 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 2 - Bowel Function [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 8 - Social Function [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Clinical Improvement Rates (Decrease in CDAI Score From Baseline of at Least 100 Points) at Weeks 4 [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Clinical Improvement Rates (Decrease in CDAI Score From Baseline of at Least 70 Points) at Weeks 4 [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 10 - Emotional Function [Time Frame: 10 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 4 - Emotional Function [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 8 - Bowel Function [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Clinical Improvement Rates (Decrease in CDAI Score From Baseline of at Least 100 Points) at Weeks 8 [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Remission After 4-week of Treatment [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Change in Total IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 10 [Time Frame: 10 Week]
Cumulative Remission Rate at Week 8 [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 2 - Systemic Symptom [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Remission After 2-week of Treatment [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 10 - Bowel Function [Time Frame: 10 Week]
Change in IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 4 - Systemic Symptom [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Change in Observed CDAI Scores From Baseline to Weeks 8 [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Change in Total IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 2 [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Change in Total IBDQ Scores From Baseline to Weeks 8 [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Clinical Improvement Rates (Decrease in CDAI Score From Baseline of at Least 100 Points) at Weeks 2 [Time Frame: 2 Week]
Clinical Improvement Rates (Decrease in CDAI Score From Baseline of at Least 70 Points) at Weeks 8 [Time Frame: 8 Week]
Cumulative Remission Rate at Week 4 [Time Frame: 4 Week]
Secondary ID(s)
D9423C00001
Source(s) of Monetary Support
Please refer to primary and secondary sponsors
Secondary Sponsor(s)
Ethics review
Results
Results available: Yes
Date Posted: 31/10/2016
Date Completed:
URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01514240
Disclaimer: Trials posted on this search portal are not endorsed by WHO, but are provided as a service to our users. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for any damages arising from the use of the information linked to in this section. None of the information obtained through use of the search portal should in any way be used in clinical care without consulting a physician or licensed health professional. WHO is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness and/or use made of the content displayed for any trial record.
Copyright - World Health Organization - Version 3.6 - Version history Please fill this short user satisfaction survey